Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Garner's avatar

It's interesting to look at the national election history over the last 20 years.

Listed below is the departure from the generic race. Example: 2006 Kay Hutchinson won by 25 1/2 points, in a year where the D won the House vote by 8 points...so Texas was R+33.

2006 Senate: R+33

2008 Senate: R+23, Prez R+22

2012 Senate: R+18, Prez R+20

2014 Senate: R+21

2016 Prez: R+11

2018 Senate R+11

2020 Senate R+13, Prez R+9

2024 Senate R+6, Prez R+10

These numbers have steadily become less red. Now, will the trend continue? It depends greatly on the Hispanic vote. In 2024, Latinos in Texas went R+10. Lots were made of their flip red, and the Pubs in Texas redistricted based on it. But was that a mirage? Latino men in particular didn't like Harris, but the overall trend does not match.

In 2020, Latinos made up 23% of the electorate and were D+16.

2022 governor race: Latinos 21%, D+16

2018 senate: Latinos 26%, D+29

2016 latinos 24%, D+27

Clearly there is also a long-term trend for Latinos to the Pubs. However, 2024 surely seems like an outlier.

My prediction of the needed national Dem advantage for the seat to flip:

Cornyn v Talarico: D+9

Cornyn v Crockett: D+13

Paxton v Talarico: D+6

Paxton v Crockett: D+9

uf911's avatar

I just voted in that primary, and for Cornyn/Crenshaw and a lot of “none of the above.” Paxton is so clearly bent, I can’t figure how deeply anchored anyone’s priors could be to brush aside all of the muck Paxton is and has been in.

Reason for posting: Turnout. I got there in the mid-morning, in the most R-leaning “not rural” district in the US, and it was basically empty. The people working the polls said it had been quiet “but more people are coming, it’ll be busy soon.” Maybe, maybe not. Posting from somewhere over Kamchatka now, headed back to my second home in Asia.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?