Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Benjamin Grayzel's avatar

There was a second ‘something’ that changed to cause Canadian liberals to rise: the resignation of a historically unpopular prime minister.

I hate to contradict this largely true narrative, but the polling leap occurred directly after Trudeau resigned on Jan 6th. Trump’s first tariff wave only launched on feb 1st, nearly a month after the liberal party began recovering in the polls.

Trump is still the central figure in this election and he absolutely contributed to the recovery, but it’s all set against the backdrop of the leader’s resignation and, critically, the election of an outsider to replace him.

I think you can draw the second conclusion from this election that choosing party outsiders (I.e. Mark Carney, not Chrystia Freeland and not Kamala Harris) seems like an optimal strategy for replacing failed leadership.

Expand full comment
Chris B's avatar
2dEdited

I find it fascinating that people think that I care whether the United States is liked, or even that I should care.

Everyone loves the friend with lots of money who spends it on everyone around him like there's no tomorrow. Then one day he wakes up, realizes that he's screwed up his life, and stops throwing away his money and suddenly he's a d*ck.

The rest of the world loves it when the U.S. bows to other leaders, gives away money with no expectations of anything in return, and props up their flailing economies with our American dollars.

They hate us when we suddenly wake up and say, "Hey, you know what...you want these things from us, you're going to have to do your part too. The status quo is completely unfair for Americans and America." Just like that rich friend, suddenly we're the d*ck.

Historically, at least in times of relative peace, the world has loved a weaker U.S. and hated a stronger one.

Happy to be hated for standing up for ourselves.

Expand full comment
115 more comments...

No posts