Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kristi B's avatar

I hope the New York Times does quit Twitter. New York Times coverage has gotten a lot saner in the last year, and I think having to rely more on their base readers, rather than just cash in on viral social media clicks for individual pieces, has helped. The drive to go viral on Twitter, Facebook etc. really worsened the quality of the news media for a long time across the board

Expand full comment
Thoughts About Stuff's avatar

The thing about Twitter is it is still, for now, free to use. If the alternative is greedy Substackers gouging their gullible readers, then give me Twitter all day long. You can get a digital subscription to a major newspaper, with all the news and opinion and extras that go with it, for only slightly more than the cost of one Substack. And the Substacker isn't under any actual obligation to produce content! We could all sign up for subscriptions to the Silver Bulletin and then Nate decides to never post again.

The walled gardens of social media were already a retrograde step from the freedom and independence of the early web. For those gardens' walls to be replaced by paywalls would be disastrous. Musk's tenure at Twitter has been a mixture of disappointing cowardice and self-inflicted blunders. But as long as Twitter remains free and open, it will still be preferable to the grasping commercialism of Substack.

Expand full comment
69 more comments...

No posts